Skip to main content

Blog

POH vs TOH — How Lenders Underwrite Mobile Home Parks

By Jason Taken · Principal, Jaken Finance Group

Park-owned homes vs tenant-owned homes — how mobile home park lenders model income, opex, and agency eligibility on MHC acquisitions.

POH vs TOH is the first fork in mobile home park underwriting — and getting it wrong kills agency refi after bridge. Industry context: Manufactured Housing Institute · Hub: manufactured home community financing

Structure comparison

TOH (tenant-owned home)POH (park-owned home)
Park ownsLand + infrastructureLand + homes
Primary incomeLot rentLot rent + home rent
OpexLowerMaintenance, turnover, habitability
Agency appetiteStrongLimited — ratio caps
Investor roleInfrastructure landlordHome landlord + park operator

How lenders model POH income

Separate line items on the pro forma:

InputTOH treatmentPOH treatment
Gross rentLot rent × occupied padsLot + home rent split
Vacancy5%–10%15%–25% on home rent
MaintenanceRoads, utilities+$150–$400/home/mo
CapExInfrastructureHome rehab between tenants
NOI marginHigherCompressed

Bridge lenders fund POH parks when conversion plan is credible — not when sponsor ignores home liability.

Agency ratio gates

AgencyPOH tolerance (typical)Implication
Freddie Mac MHCUnder 5% POHHeavy POH = no Freddie exit
Fannie Mae MHCUp to ~25% POHSome legacy POH OK
Community bankCase-by-caseStabilized TOH preferred

Most sub-$3M mom-and-pop parks fail agency gates on day one — see MHP loans under $3M.

Value-add: POH-to-TOH conversion

  1. Sell home to resident — installment sale or cash
  2. Rent-to-own home to tenant — then transfer title
  3. Remove abandoned POH — pad-only TOH lot

Conversion unlocks Freddie/Fannie MHC and higher exit cap rate on infrastructure-only income.

Playbook: bridge-to-agency MHP

Worked example — 40-pad park, 35% POH

Purchase: $920,000 · 14 POH units · 26 TOH pads

MetricAs-acquiredPost-conversion (18 mo)
POH count14 (35%)2 (5%)
Occupancy74%88%
NOI (annual)$118K$168K
Refi pathCommunity bank onlyFreddie MHC eligible

Bridge: 68% LTV + $95K holdback for home disposition and roads.

Worked example — TOH-only 52-pad park (no POH conversion needed)

Profile: Midwest TOH park, city water/sewer, 82% occupancy, mom-and-pop seller.

LineAmount
Purchase$1,240,000
Lot rent (avg)$425/mo × 43 occupied pads
Gross annual rent~$219,300
Vacancy (8%)−$17,544
OpEx (38%)−$83,334
NOI~$118,422
Cap rate at purchase~9.55%
Bridge LTV (70%)$868,000
Equity$372,000

Agency refi at month 14 (Freddie MHC eligible — 0% POH):

LineAmount
Appraisal (occupancy lifted to 88%)$1,480,000
NOI (annual, stabilized)~$142,000
DSCR at 1.30xMax debt service ~$109,230/yr
Freddie loan (75% LTV)$1,110,000
Bridge payoff−$868,000
Closing costs−$38,000
Net cash to sponsor~$204,000

TOH parks skip the POH conversion timeline — refi path is occupancy lift + infrastructure capex, not home disposition. See bridge-to-agency MHP playbook for month-by-month gates.

POH home disposition — three paths with economics

PathTimelineCost per homeBest when
Cash sale to tenant30–90 days$500–$1,500 closingTenant has savings + credit
Rent-to-own (12–24 mo)12–24 months$200/mo adminTenant needs time to qualify
Abandoned home removal14–30 days$3,000–$8,000Home is uninhabitable

On the 40-pad / 35% POH example above, converting 12 POH to TOH over 18 months required $72,000 in home disposition budget ($6K avg per unit) — funded from bridge holdback, not operating cash flow. Parks that skip this budget line run out of capital at unit 8.

Lender sensitivity — how POH ratio changes bridge terms

POH ratioTypical bridge LTVHoldback for home CapExAgency exit
0%–5%70%–75%Infrastructure onlyFreddie/Fannie eligible
6%–15%65%–70%Home + infrastructureFannie may qualify
16%–25%60%–65%Heavy home budgetFannie only (verify guide)
26%+55%–60%Conversion requiredCommunity bank exit

Bridge lenders who fund 35% POH without a written conversion schedule are either pricing risk into rate or have not underwritten your refi exit. Ask for agency gate confirmation in writing before close.

DSCR modeling difference — side-by-side on same park

Same 40-pad park, $920K purchase, 74% occupancy:

Pro forma lineTOH-only (26 pads TOH, 14 POH)Fully converted TOH
Gross rent$298,000/yr$248,000/yr (lot rent only)
Vacancy18% blended8%
Maintenance$67,200/yr$28,000/yr
NOI$118,000$168,000
Implied value at 8% cap$1,475,000$2,100,000
Exit cap rate (agency)N/A — ineligible6.5%–7.5%

POH gross rent inflates top-line but compresses NOI margin — agency underwriters strip POH home rent and value land + infrastructure income only. That is why conversion unlocks $625K+ in value on this example even though gross rent drops.

Due diligence items specific to POH parks

Before LOI on a heavy-POH park, request:

  1. Home inventory schedule — year, size, condition, tenant name per POH unit
  2. Title status on each home — park-owned vs lease-to-own vs abandoned
  3. 12-month home turnover log — vacancy days between POH tenants
  4. Habitability inspection reports — county enforcement history
  5. Utility allocation — who pays electric/gas on POH units (park vs tenant)

Missing item #3 is the most common reason bridge lenders retrade LTV at final underwriting — turnover cost was never modeled.

State market guides

Risks

  1. Home abandonment — removal cost $3K–$8K per unit
  2. Habitability lawsuits — POH landlord liability
  3. Agency surprise — refi denied at high POH ratio
  4. Rent control — rare but caps lot-rent upside
  5. Well/septic — limits agency regardless of TOH mix

Refi gate checklist (agency vs bank)

Before month 12 on bridge, confirm:

  • Occupancy % — 80%+ for Freddie target
  • POH ratio — under 5%–25% per agency
  • DSCR — 1.25x+ on trailing NOI
  • Utilities — city water/sewer or bank waiver
  • Loan size — $3M+ for Fannie/Freddie MHC

Miss one gate → community bank exit instead — still viable, model lower proceeds.

Nationwide MHC bridge: manufactured home community financing.


POH-heavy parks are financeable on bridge with a credible TOH conversion plan — without it, refi options narrow sharply.

POH vs TOH — How Lenders Underwrite Mobile Home Parks — next step (2026)

Qualified non-owner-occupied files run 8.99%–13.5% IO bridge and 5.75%–10.5% DSCR when exit and comps are documented at submission.

Submit scenario · Pre-qualify · (833) 264-7776.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between POH and TOH mobile home parks?
TOH (tenant-owned home): resident owns the structure, park owns the pad — lot rent only. POH (park-owned home): park owns structure and rents the unit — higher gross rent but higher maintenance and habitability liability.
Do lenders prefer tenant-owned home parks?
Yes — institutional and agency lenders strongly prefer TOH because the park is a land-and-infrastructure asset, not a landlord of depreciating homes.
What POH ratio will Fannie and Freddie accept?
Fannie Mae MHC allows roughly up to 25% park-owned homes; Freddie Mac typically requires under 5% POH for agency eligibility — verify current seller/servicer guides.
Can bridge lenders finance heavy POH parks?
Yes — underwrite home rent separately, model higher turnover and CapEx, and plan POH-to-TOH conversion before agency refi.

Need financing for your next project?

Talk to a Jaken Finance Group lending specialist about hard money options tailored to your deal.

Or call (833) 264-7776