Skip to main content

Manufactured Home Community Financing — Mobile Home Park Loans

Mobile home park financing loan — park-level acquisition and value-add capital. Park-owned vs tenant-owned structures and lot-rent DSCR underwriting explained.

Investors searching mobile home park financing, manufactured home community loan, and MHC acquisition financing are underwriting a commercial income asset — not a single dwelling. A manufactured home community (MHC) generates revenue from lot rent (and optionally park-owned home rent), with infrastructure, density, and occupancy driving valuation.

This page covers park-level acquisition and value-add financing — distinct from private lending for manufactured homes, which addresses single-unit dwelling loans. Compare: commercial real estate financing · self-storage financing · RV park financing

Park-owned vs. tenant-owned home structures

StructureWho owns the homeWho owns the land/padLender preference
Tenant-owned (TOH)ResidentPark (lot lease)Preferred — park is land + infrastructure only
Park-owned (POH)ParkParkAccepted — higher management intensity
HybridMix of TOH and POHParkUnderwrite each income stream separately

Tenant-owned communities are the institutional standard: the park collects lot rent, residents maintain their homes, and the park’s capital obligation is infrastructure (roads, utilities, septic/water, clubhouse). Park-owned communities generate higher gross rent but carry maintenance, turnover, and habitability liability on every unit.

For single-unit manufactured home financing (one dwelling, not the park), see fund your dream: private lending for manufactured homes.

MHC vs. residential investor loans

FactorSFR / multifamilyManufactured home community
Asset classResidentialCommercial / land-lease
IncomeUnit rentLot rent (+ POH rent if applicable)
TenantLeaseholderLot lessee (owns or rents home)
InfrastructureBuilding systemsPads, utilities, roads, septic/water
GSE fitDSCR possibleNo — commercial underwriting
Value-addRehab unitsFill vacant pads, raise lot rent, upgrade infrastructure

Financing options compared

ProgramBest forTypical timelineLeverage
Bridge / hard moneyAcquisition, fill vacant pads, infrastructure upgrade14–30 days65%–75% LTV + CapEx holdback
Bank commercialStabilized 90%+ occupancy45–90 days65%–75% LTV
CMBSLarger stabilized parks ($3M+)60–120 days65%–70% LTV
Seller financingSmaller parks, mom-and-pop sellersVariesNegotiated

Bridge rates: 9.5%–13.5% IO typical.

DSCR treatment of lot-rent income

Lenders model lot rent as the primary income stream:

InputHow lenders model it
Gross lot rentMonthly lot rent × occupied pads
POH rent (if applicable)Home rent modeled separately with higher opex
Vacancy5%–10% stabilized; 15%–25% on fill-up
Operating expensesWater/sewer, trash, road maintenance, management (8%–10%), insurance, tax
NOIGross minus opex
DSCRNOI ÷ annual PITIA

Worked example — 60-pad TOH community:

LineAmount
Purchase price$1,200,000
Occupied pads54 of 60 (90%)
Average lot rent$425/mo
Gross monthly lot rent$22,950
Vacancy (10%)($2,295)
Opex (30% of EGI)($6,196)
Monthly NOI~$14,459
DSCR at 70% LTV, 7.5%~1.28

Value-add strategies and financing

StrategyCapital needFinancing
Fill vacant padsMarketing + minor infrastructureBridge with working-capital reserve
Lot rent increase to marketMinimal CapEx — NOI lift at refiBridge acquisition, refi at higher NOI
Infrastructure upgrade (septic, water, roads)$150K–$500KBridge with construction holdbacks
POH-to-TOH conversionHome sell-off or removalBridge; simplify income stream for refi
Pad expansion (add 10–20 pads)Land prep + utility extensionBridge + see vacant land loans

Case pattern: acquire a 45-pad TOH park at $900K (78% occupied), invest $120K in road repair and utility upgrades, fill to 92% occupancy over 12 months while raising lot rent $35/pad, then refi at $1.3M appraised on stabilized NOI.

What lenders review on MHC files

  • Pad count and expansion capacity (zoning)
  • Occupancy % and tenant tenure
  • Lot rent vs. market — upside or at ceiling?
  • Utility structure — public water/sewer vs. well/septic (lender diligence)
  • Park-owned vs. tenant-owned mix
  • Infrastructure condition — roads, electrical, drainage
  • P&L trailing 12 months
  • Sponsor experience — MHC or commercial operating history

Risks

  1. Septic/water capacity — limits pad expansion; engineering required
  2. Rent control — rare but emerging in some states
  3. Home removal cost — vacated POH units may require abandonment or removal
  4. Flood and environmental — low-lying parks near rivers
  5. Tenant quality — lot lease enforcement and community standards

Submit commercial scenario · Commercial financing · (833) 264-7776

Rates, terms and conditions offered only to qualified borrowers and are subject to change at any time without notice. Jaken Finance Group underwrites select investor bridge and commercial files.

Ready to fund your next deal?

Get pre-qualified in minutes. Speak with a lending specialist or start your application online.

Or call (833) 264-7776