Blog
Understanding Loan-to-Cost Ratios in Hard Money
By Jason Taken · Principal, Jaken Finance Group
LTC for fix-and-flip and rehab bridge — formula, binding constraint vs ARV cap, draw schedules, and a full worked example showing when LTC limits your leverage.
Loan-to-cost (LTC) tells you what share of your total project spend a hard money lender will fund. For non-owner-occupied fix-and-flip and value-add bridge files, LTC is the ratio investors quote first — and misapply most often by ignoring ARV cap and as-is LTV on the same term sheet.
Jaken Finance Group sizes qualified investment-property bridge at 8.99%–13.5% interest-only with up to 90% LTC on many rehab files and up to 100% LTC on select qualified programs when economics support risk. The funded loan is always the minimum of LTC, ARV cap, and acquisition LTV limits — not whichever headline sounds best.
This guide defines LTC, contrasts it with LTV, walks through draw mechanics, and delivers a binding constraint worked example you can replicate before LOI.
What is a hard money loan · LTV fundamentals · ARV cap vs LTC.
LTC formula and what counts in “cost”
LTC = (Loan Amount ÷ Total Project Cost) × 100
Total project cost typically includes:
| Cost bucket | Usually included? |
|---|---|
| Purchase price or acquisition basis | Yes |
| Rehab scope (materials + labor) | Yes |
| Contingency (10%–15% of scope) | Yes |
| Permits, plans, engineering | Often — confirm with lender |
| Interest reserve | Sometimes capitalized — policy-specific |
| Closing costs, points | Usually excluded — sponsor cash |
| Carry during hold | Excluded — sponsor cash |
Example: $175,000 purchase + $52,000 scope + $6,240 contingency (12%) = $233,240 all-in. At 90% LTC, max loan = $209,916.
Always reconcile all-in definition with your term sheet before modeling equity requirement.
LTC vs LTV — same loan, different denominators
| Metric | Denominator | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| LTC | All-in project cost | Rehab/flip — “How much of spend is financed?” |
| LTV (as-is) | Current appraised value | Acquisition leg — “How much of today’s value?” |
| ARV cap | After-repair value | Exit cushion — “How much of tomorrow’s value?” |
LTC can be 90% while ARV cap enforces 75% of exit — producing a lower absolute loan. Investors who budget equity using LTC alone arrive short at closing.
Demystifying LTV for investors · DSCR hold exits.
Typical LTC bands on non-owner-occupied bridge
Qualified files at Jaken Finance Group commonly see:
| Program tier | LTC range | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Standard fix-and-flip | Up to 90% | Cosmetic to moderate rehab |
| Qualified high-LTC | Up to 100% | Strong ARV spread, experienced sponsor |
| Heavy value-add | 85%–90% | Scope risk may tighten cap |
| New construction | Up to 100% LTC on qualified files | As-completed value tests apply |
LTC is never standalone. ARV cap up to 75% on fix-and-flip and as-is LTV on acquisition run in parallel.
Draw schedules — LTC releases in milestones
Hard money LTC is not a single wire at closing. Lenders fund:
- Acquisition advance — capped by as-is LTV and initial LTC policy
- Rehab draws — inspection-gated releases against scope line items
- Final advance — punch-list completion
Cumulative advances cannot exceed min(LTC max, ARV cap) even if individual draws were approved incrementally.
Draw discipline protects both parties: sponsors avoid over-advancing before work is done; lenders avoid unsecured exposure beyond collateral value.
Fix-and-flip loan requirements · 100% LTC program details.
Worked example — LTC binds (binding constraint walkthrough)
Deal: Midwest 3/2 SFR, non-owner-occupied, LLC vesting. Cosmetic-to-moderate rehab.
Step 1 — Build all-in cost
| Line item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Purchase price | $168,000 |
| Rehab scope (kitchen, baths, floors, paint) | $38,500 |
| Contingency 12% | $4,620 |
| Permits | $1,200 |
| Total project cost | $212,320 |
Step 2 — Run LTC scenarios
| LTC tier | Calculation | Max loan |
|---|---|---|
| 85% LTC | 0.85 × $212,320 | $180,472 |
| 90% LTC | 0.90 × $212,320 | $191,088 |
| 100% LTC (qualified) | 1.00 × $212,320 | $212,320 |
Policy offers 90% LTC on this file.
Step 3 — Run ARV cap
Sold comps support ARV $285,000.
| ARV cap | Calculation | Max loan |
|---|---|---|
| 75% ARV | 0.75 × $285,000 | $213,750 |
Step 4 — Identify binding constraint
| Constraint | Max loan |
|---|---|
| 90% LTC | $191,088 |
| 75% ARV | $213,750 |
LTC binds at $191,088. ARV cap is not limiting — exit spread is healthy.
Step 5 — Sponsor equity and carry
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| All-in cost | $212,320 |
| Loan (binding) | $191,088 |
| Cash to project | $21,232 |
| Plus closing/points | ~$5,000–$8,000 sponsor |
Rate 10.75% IO on $191,088 → monthly ~$1,712.
Hold 6 months → IO carry ~$10,272.
Step 6 — Exit spread check
| Line | Amount |
|---|---|
| ARV | $285,000 |
| Less 8% sale costs | −$22,800 |
| Net proceeds | $262,200 |
| Less all-in cost | −$212,320 |
| Less IO carry | −$10,272 |
| Approx gross profit | ~$39,608 |
LTC-bound deal with wide ARV margin — textbook cosmetic flip geometry.
Worked example — when LTC does NOT bind (contrast)
Same sponsor, different geometry — heavy rehab, thinner ARV.
| Line item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Total project cost | $248,000 |
| ARV | $305,000 |
| Constraint | Calculation | Max loan |
|---|---|---|
| 90% LTC | 0.90 × $248,000 | $223,200 |
| 75% ARV | 0.75 × $305,000 | $228,750 |
LTC still binds at $223,200. Tighten ARV to $290,000:
| 75% ARV | 0.75 × $290,000 | $217,500 |
ARV cap binds at $217,500 — $5,700 less than 90% LTC. Extra equity required vs LTC-only model.
Understanding both outcomes is the point of LTC analysis — not quoting 90% in isolation.
LTV and ARV caps guide · Using hard money to invest.
Factors that raise or lower your LTC ceiling
Sponsor track record. Documented exits support higher LTC tiers and access to 100% LTC qualified programs.
ARV spread. Underwriters compute spread = (ARV − all-in) ÷ all-in. Thin spread triggers lower LTC or tighter ARV cap regardless of headline policy.
Asset class. SFR flips fit standard grids. Manufactured, multi-family, and mixed-use carry different LTC matrices.
Scope complexity. Foundation, structural, or layout changes increase execution risk — LTC may cap below 90% even for experienced sponsors.
Market liquidity. Thin comp sets force conservative ARV, which makes ARV cap bind sooner — effectively lowering achievable LTC dollars.
LTC on BRRRR bridge vs DSCR exit
BRRRR uses LTC during bridge phase and LTV during DSCR permanent phase:
| Phase | Sizing metric | Product | Rate band |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acquire + rehab | LTC + ARV cap | Hard money IO | 8.99%–13.5% |
| Stabilized hold | As-is LTV + DSCR | DSCR P&I | 5.75%–10.5% |
Bridge LTC at 90% does not translate to 90% LTV on refi. Model refi at 80%–85% LTV on post-rehab as-is appraisal with executed lease.
How a DSCR loan works · Private money vs hard money.
Strategies to optimize LTC without over-leveraging
Negotiate purchase price. Every dollar off acquisition drops all-in cost — at 90% LTC, $10,000 price reduction saves $9,000 loan need and $900+ equity.
Scope discipline. Separate must-do from nice-to-have before LOI. Scope creep inflates cost faster than ARV.
Accurate contingency. Under-budgeting contingency forces out-of-pocket mid-project when draws stall.
Compare lenders on binding loan, not headline LTC. Two desks offering “90% LTC” may apply different ARV caps, contingency rules, or soft-cost inclusion.
Pre-sale or pre-lease exit. Documented exit supports higher LTC tier assignment at underwriting.
LTC checklist before you submit
- Build all-in cost with scope, contingency, and allowed soft costs
- Calculate LTC loan at offered tier (85%, 90%, 100%)
- Calculate ARV cap loan at 75% (or desk-specific cap)
- Take minimum — that is binding loan
- Subtract from all-in for equity requirement
- Add closing, points, and IO carry at quoted rate in 8.99%–13.5% band
- Stress ARV −10% — if ARV cap becomes binding, recalculate equity
- Confirm draw schedule matches contractor payment timing
Files with this math attached close in 7–14 business days on complete submissions.
Related resources
- What is a hard money loan · DSCR loans
- Demystifying LTV · ARV cap vs LTC
- Investment financing beginner map
- Hard money application process
- Submit scenario · Pre-qualify
Understanding Loan-to-Cost Ratios in Hard Money — next step (2026)
Bridge 8.99%–13.5% IO works when sold comps, scope contingency, and resale timeline are in the file at LOI — not ARV alone.
Submit scenario · Pre-qualify · (833) 264-7776.
Rates, terms and conditions offered only to qualified borrowers and are subject to change at any time without notice. Closing times are in business days and commence upon receipt of appraisal payment and satisfaction of borrower conditions. Closing times may be delayed due to appraiser property access . All loans are subject to full underwriting for loan approvals. Jaken Finance Group only finances non-owner occupied investment properties.
Review our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
Click Here to Read our FAQs
Jaken Finance Group, 2300 Barrington Road, Suite 400, Hoffman Estates, IL 60196